Hello,
Hi Phenix users,
I was trying to experiment with phenix.refine
using default parameters (2Y78.pdb) and I got the
following message.
Multiple
equally suitable arrays of observed X-ray data found.
Possible choices:
2Y78.mtz:IOBS,SIGIOBS
2Y78.mtz:I(+),SIGI(+),I(-),SIGI(-)
Please use refinement.input.xray_data.labels
to specify an unambiguous substring of the target
label.
Anyway, two questions related to this:
1) How does one pick of the two options above?
If your question is about the syntax:
phenix.refine model.pdb data.mtz
xray_data.labels="IOBS,SIGIOBS"
or
phenix.refine model.pdb data.mtz
xray_data.labels="I(+),SIGI(+"
(sub-string should work).
If your question is about choice anomalous vs
non-anomalous data to be used: I would use anomalous
because it is a richer source of information, you will
get anomalous difference map, you can refine anomalous
f'&f'', etc.
2) If R work/R free went from 0.1044/0.1142 to
0.1096/0.1200 is that bad or is it acceptable?
R-factors look similar to me. Systematic slight increase
may mean you need to adjust target weights or choose
refinement strategy more tailored to the quality of
input data and model.
Pavel