Hi, Tom, Pavel and Joe,
> I'm glad you put that option in, Pavel. However for model-
> building it is not so straightforward. Normally we are building into density-modified
> maps. Density modification works poorly when a significant set of
> reflections is excluded, so this becomes impractical.
As
I remember it was a paper (by Blanc, ..., Bricogne ? am I wrong?
Ifailed to find it right now) where they faced exactly this
problem.Again, as I remember they suggested to exclude the test-set
reflectionsfrom the map calculation but , to minimize the map
deformation, insteadof them include average Fobs for the corresponding
resolution shell.
Is it a way to answer the original question / problem ?
As I understand, a similar technique Pavel already uses to calculate the maps with Fobs missed.
Best regards,
Sacha