Hi Peter, you suggest to calculate "the (free) likelihood".. May I ask: specifically likelihood of what you are suggesting to calculate and what is "free" in this context? I guess I'm just lost in jargon, sorry! Thanks, Pavel On 2/11/15 8:08 PM, Peter Zwart wrote:
Dear All,
How meaningful are the second derivative based estimates obtained via full matrix inversion when the gradient is not 0 (i.e. when not in the minimum)? I can understand that when you are working with high-resolution data and your R-value is close to 0, things could work, but what happens when around a more challenging 2A?
If you are interested in the uncertainty of the occupancy, I recommend not doing any refinement, but just generate a list of occupancies and B-values for the atom of interest and compute the (free) likelihood for each model. Subsequent normalisation of the neg-exponent of these values, should provide you with an answer that could be just as believable as any other method around. A little bit of python scripting should do the trick quite easily.
Both the full matrix inversion and the suggestion above probe the steepness of the data-agreement hole the structure is sitting in. Pavels suggestion explores the spread of local minima around the starting configuration. I am not sure what method is more appropriate, perhaps it is instructive to know what problem you are trying to solve.
HTH P
On 11 February 2015 at 16:13, Masaki UNNO
mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Dear all
Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will try making a number of models in which the atom has different occupancies (e.g. 0.1-1.0). Then, I will refine them by restraining the B-factors. Actually, our structure contains some reaction intermediates not only the substrate. So I would like to estimate the ratio.
Best regards
Masaki -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] mailto:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pavel Afonine Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 6:36 AM To: Dale Tronrud; [email protected] mailto:[email protected] Subject: Re: [phenixbb] How should we estimate the "uncertainty" of the occupancy of an atom?
Hi Dale,
> P.S. I'll look up the paper you reference but my university does not > subscribe to acta Cryst and getting those papers takes time.
it is open access:
http://phenix-online.org/papers/wd5073_reprint.pdf
All the best, Pavel
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] mailto:[email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] mailto:[email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- P.H. Zwart Staff Scientist Berkeley Center for Structural Biology, Science lead Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA-94703, USA Cell: 510 289 9246 SASTBX: http://sastbx.als.lbl.gov BCSB: http://bcsb.als.lbl.gov PHENIX: http://www.phenix-online.org -----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb