Hi Morten,

Yes, you've guessed correctly that the regression tests do check the numbers in the output compared to a standard run. In some cases (as the two that you show) some minor change in the algorithms can give "failures" that are just due to small changes in algorithms. 狢 think you can probably ignore these two errors. I'll be checking these here and I'll just have it ignore these differences if they are uninteresting.

All the best,
Tom T

On Jan 7, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Morten Groftehauge wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I just updated Rosetta to 3.4 and it seems to have compiled correctly (at least no error interruptions). I've done this enough to not be satisfied by that and ran
> > phenix_regression.wizards.test_command_line_rosetta_quick
> which goes past the Rosetta tests correctly but fails at
> =================================================================
> Running test_prerefine
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Numbers do not match: 0.47825 0.53601
> r {{ 0.87799 � 0.06946 �-0.47362}
> � 𣏵-0.02049 � 0.99396 � 0.10779}
> � 𣏵 0.47825 �-0.08494 � 0.87411}}
> ---
> r {{ 0.84375 � 0.06393 �-0.53291}
> � 𣏵-0.02789 � 0.99676 � 0.07541}
> � 𣏵 0.53601 �-0.04877 � 0.84280}}
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> FAILED
> See log files test_prerefine/test_prerefine.log 慯est_prerefine/test_prerefine_current.log
> =================================================================
> Running test_prerefine_double
> OK
> =================================================================
> Running test_prerefine_no_data
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Numbers do not match: 0.47825 0.53601
> r {{ 0.87799 � 0.06946 �-0.47362}
> � 𣏵-0.02049 � 0.99396 � 0.10779}
> � 𣏵 0.47825 �-0.08494 � 0.87411}}
> ---
> r {{ 0.84375 � 0.06393 �-0.53291}
> � 𣏵-0.02789 � 0.99676 � 0.07541}
> � 𣏵 0.53601 �-0.04877 � 0.84280}}
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> FAILED
> See log files test_prerefine_no_data/test_prerefine_no_data.log 慯est_prerefine_no_data/test_prerefine_no_data_current.log
> =================================================================
> When I look in the log there are no error messages. I don't need to prerefine so I'm good but I still find it weird.
> I tried again with Rosetta 3.3 and got no error flags.
>
> Is it because the quick tests are checking the result against the results that you got earlier and the algorithm has been changed between 3.3 and 3.4?
>
> Cheers,
> Morten
>
> PS Really enjoyed the talks at the CCP4 study weekend.
>
> --
> Morten K Grøftehauge, PhD
> Pohl Group
> Durham University

> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb@phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb