8 May
2009
8 May
'09
1:26 p.m.
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Bryan W. Lepore wrote:
i used --unused_ok b/c it looks like that's what its for. On Thu, 7 May 2009, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote: I'm going to retire that option when I get a chance since it causes too much confusion. On Fri, 8 May 2009, Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] wrote:
Could you please NOT do this.
i ought to say that i made my .def edits without too much trouble (simply putting in f' f'' refinement), --unused_ok, things worked perfectly, and the output .def i think covers what was in the old .def. still though, having a one-line phenix version/tag label in the top of the .def would be handy. -bryan