phenix.refine does not work with the LINK lines in any way (long story).
Dear all,I have been stuck in the problem for a while. I appreciate any suggestions.I have two zinc binding domain in my 3A structure which are Cys4 type. The geometry is OK for one domain, but it is not refined properly in the other one.The problems during phenix refinement are1. Zinc is always refined to position ~0.5A off from its correct position2. The refined bond lengths of four Cys-Zn are all below 2.33. Sometimes, distances between SG atoms of nearby cysteines are too close, and coot just connect them as disulfate bond.4. Sometimes, I get the following message showing that all bond angles are outliers with >8 sigmas, I listed part of the outliers.Top angle outliers (sorted by deviation):atoms ideal model difference deviation (sigma)----------------------------------------------------------------------------SG CYS D1204 57.894 104.470 46.576 9.32ZN ZN D2001SG CYS D1112
SG CYS D1201 50.842 92.496 41.654 8.33ZN ZN D2001SG CYS D1204SG CYS D1204 126.952 92.496 -34.455 -6.89ZN ZN D2001SG CYS D1201
SG CYS D1201 52.183 86.105 33.922 6.78ZN ZN D2001SG CYS D1112SG CYS D1194 152.275 119.729 -32.546 -6.51ZN ZN D2001SG CYS D1112
SG CYS D1112 89.273 119.729 30.456 6.09ZN ZN D2001SG CYS D1194I also post my metal.edit file for refinementrefinement.geometry_restraints.edits {bond {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_2 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1201distance_ideal = 2.310000sigma = 0.100}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {bond {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_2 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1194distance_ideal = 2.310000sigma = 0.100}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {bond {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_2 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1112distance_ideal = 2.310000sigma = 0.100}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {bond {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_2 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1204distance_ideal = 2.310000sigma = 0.100}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {angle {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1194atom_selection_2 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_3 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1201angle_ideal = 112.172178sigma = 5}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {angle {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1112atom_selection_2 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_3 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1201angle_ideal = 87.092184sigma = 5}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {angle {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1112atom_selection_2 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_3 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1194angle_ideal = 118.116518sigma = 5}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {angle {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1204atom_selection_2 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_3 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1201angle_ideal = 91.677138sigma = 5}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {angle {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1204atom_selection_2 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_3 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1194angle_ideal = 130.829256sigma = 5}}refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {angle {action = *addatom_selection_1 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1204atom_selection_2 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_3 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1112angle_ideal = 104.886672sigma = 5}}Questions,1. Why the ideal bond angle are different in the metal.edit file and final model ? How does phenix determine the ideal bond_angle?For example, in the metal.edit fileatom_selection_1 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1204atom_selection_2 = name ZN and chain D and resname ZN and resseq 2001atom_selection_3 = name SG and chain D and resname CYS and resseq 1112The angle_ideal = 104.886672But in the final modelatoms ideal model difference deviation (sigma)----------------------------------------------------------------------------SG CYS D1204 57.894 104.470 46.576 9.32ZN ZN D2001SG CYS D11122. Do I need to put the following LINK in the pdb header to run refinement?LINK ZN ZN D2001 SG CYS D1201 1555 1555 2.34LINK ZN ZN D2001 SG CYS D1112 1555 1555 2.33LINK ZN ZN D2001 SG CYS D1194 1555 1555 2.38LINK ZN ZN D2001 SG CYS D1204 1555 1555 2.373. After phenix refinement, the output pdb doesn't contain these LINK lines no matter what the inpout pdb is. Does phenix_refine use these restrains of LINK lines?Thanks.Yu ZhangPostdoc fellowRutgers University
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb