[phenixbb] Re: for autobuild full sequence?

Hi James, A potential alternative could be to try to integrate some distance restraints into the structure prediction using other tools (Chai-1 comes to mind, but there may be others too). Then put some loose restraints just to prevent disordered regions like your N-terminus from clashing with your symmetry mates. Though, like AlphaFold, it wouldn’t be “symmetry aware” so you’d have to work out those distances yourself. Tom -- Thomas D. Grant, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Structural Biology Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo 955 Main Street, Room 5156 Buffalo, New York 14203 Office: 716-829-5490 Email: [email protected] ________________________________ From: Tom Terwilliger Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 5:26:13 PM To: James Holton Cc: PHENIX user mailing list Subject: [phenixbb] Re: for autobuild full sequence? Hi James, Oh yes I see, AlphaFold doesn't know about space group symmetry. So then you would have to...generate your partial model and all the symmetry-equivalent models that are in contact, make their residue numbers run sequentially and combine into one big model with missing residues and with gaps long enough for plausible linkers. Then supply AlphaFold with one sequence representing N full chains with the linkers in between and supply the pseudo-model. Could work if your molecule is not too big... All the best, Tom T On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 2:50 PM James Holton mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Yes, I tried this, and found that the disordered N terminus was stabbing deep into the heart of a symmetry mate. phenix.refine was not happy about this, and Amber went positively ballistic (so to speak). I suppose I could start with some kind of "pre-exploded" unit cell where all the ASUs are far apart and then gradually try to bring them together, but that seems like a lot of work. On 4/1/2025 1:26 PM, Tom Terwilliger wrote: Hi James, You could try this: 1. Get your best model, including only residues assigned to sequence, with AutoBuild or whatever 2. Run AlphaFold (for example from the Phenix GUI where this is easy) supplying the full sequence and supplying your partially-built model. The resulting model should look mostly like the one you supplied, with plausible connections for the gaps. All the best, Tom T On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 2:23 PM James Holton mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Yes, but I don't want it to clash with other molecules in the unit cell, including itself. When I was an undergrad, Steve Mayo called this an "amorphous builder". Trivial in concept, but you need to do a "bump check" after adding each atom, and then have a plan for what to do if you hit a bump. Make sense? -James On 4/1/2025 1:10 PM, Pavel Afonine wrote: Hi James, Are you just looking to string residues together in a line from start to end according to your sequence? That’s a quick 10-minute exercise using CCTBX, but I suspect that’s not exactly what you need. Pavel On 4/1/25 12:28, Tom Terwilliger wrote: Hi James, I think there is no way to force AutoBuild to build a full sequence when there is no density. All the best, Tom T On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:26 AM James Holton mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Hey all, Don't worry, nothing is funny today. I have a real question: Is there a way to force phenix.autobuild to build in the entire sequence? As in: the full length of the actual molecule that is in the crystal, such as what is supposed to go into SEQRES, regardless of "visible" density? I am trying to come up with a pipeline for prepping MD simulations of protein crystals. It seems proper to me that the molecule being simulated should be the actual molecular species, disordered bits an all. However, we don't seem to have good technology for building protein chains into "nothingness". Yes, I know Alphafold is a thing, but it is rubbish at clashes in the context of a crystal. I mean, I could write something, but does this tool already exist? Cheers, and happy Tuesday, -James Holton MAD Scientist _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list -- [email protected]mailto:[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]mailto:[email protected] Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave@%(host_name)s -- Thomas C Terwilliger Laboratory Fellow, Los Alamos National Laboratory Senior Scientist, New Mexico Consortium 100 Entrada Dr, Los Alamos, NM 87544 Email: [email protected]mailto:[email protected] Tel: 505-431-0010 _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list -- [email protected]mailto:[email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]mailto:[email protected] Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave@%(host_name)s -- Thomas C Terwilliger Laboratory Fellow, Los Alamos National Laboratory Senior Scientist, New Mexico Consortium 100 Entrada Dr, Los Alamos, NM 87544 Email: [email protected]mailto:[email protected] Tel: 505-431-0010 -- Thomas C Terwilliger Laboratory Fellow, Los Alamos National Laboratory Senior Scientist, New Mexico Consortium 100 Entrada Dr, Los Alamos, NM 87544 Email: [email protected]mailto:[email protected] Tel: 505-431-0010