For relatively low resolution maps, where sugar moieties cannot be placed unambiguously, in theory (say Agirre (2017) and Emsley and Crispin (2018)) pyranose placement within the map should be quite highly restrained by ideal geometry for the specific sugar expected from prior knowledge. In practice, however, it’s not entirely clear how to maintain these restraints on pyranose geometry and conformation during manual building in Coot, (....)
Meanwhile, in Phenix I don’t do anything specific for the refinement of glycosylation sugars (should I?) other than apply the appropriate restraints for any low resolution EM map; are there specific restraints files I ought to be using within Phenix real space refine jobs for N-linked sugars?
Then I noticed that loads of existing PDB entries containing N-linked glycans contain similar outliers in pyranose geometry.
Or is this a tolerable situation where sugar geometries differ from ideal even at low resolution?
Is it perhaps a matter of different targets being used for PDB validation by the rcsb versus by Coot?