Well, I agreed but then I realised that when since it is being stated in the beginning of the log file that it is using the xxx_scale values (even though it's not) it might confuse some people even more than it confused me. In addition the fix_xxx default values aren't in the GUI so you have to start guessing from a blank.
It matters not to me since I need the optimize option at this point.
Cheers,
Morten
Hi Morten,
that might be a glitch... Though as long as you can define fix_xxx weights you can take these constants into account anyway!
So, yes, I see it as a "cosmetic" problem, but I don't think it matters too much in reality.
Pavel
On 6/20/12 5:36 AM, Morten Groftehauge wrote:Hi all,
I tried specifying wxc, wxu, wxu_scale and wxc_scale as you can see from the log file:target_weights {wxc_scale = 0.50001wxu_scale = 0.49999fix_wxc = 6fix_wxu = 0.35}but the refinement proceeds with the default values for _scale:========================== Target weights: x-ray data =========================
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|| XYZ refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxc * wxc_scale + Echem * wc || wxc = 6.000000 wxc_scale = 1.000 wc = 1.000 || angle between x-ray and geometry gradient vectors: None (deg) || || ADP refinement: T = Eexperimental * wxu * wxu_scale + Eadp * wu || wxu = 0.350000 wxu_scale = 0.500 wu = 1.000 || angle between Xray and ADP gradient vectors: None (deg) ||-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I am running dev-1082, used the GUI for phenix.refine.
Cheers,Morten
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb