Pavel,
Thanks. I actually just want to do a very simple thing. In the days
before TLS refinement, we use B-factor distributions to find the
ordered and less ordered regions in the structure, i.e. low B-
factors, ordered region and high B-factors, less ordered region. I
just wondered if I can still do that with the isotropic equivalent B-
factors after a TLS refinement. Or should I just get a real isotropic
B-factors distribution by re-refining the model without TLS?
-- Jianghai
On May 11, 2008, at 2:03 AM, Pavel Afonine wrote:
Hi Jianghai,
If I compare the isotropic equivalent B-factor
after TLS refinement to the isotropic B-factor without TLS
refinement,
will they have the same trend?
yes, only if:
1) the choice of TLS groups is correct;
2) the restraints on isotropic individual B-factors are not too tight.
I want to use the B-factor
distribution to describe the ordered and disordered region in the
structure, will the TLS refinement skew that?
I'm not sure what exactly you want to do here. But anyway, by using
TLS
model you better describe atomic ADP: TLS models global domain motion
and individual B-factors model local atomic vibrations; that is each
kind of motion receives dedicated parameterization (which is good).
However, if you model everything with individual B-factors (no TLS)
the
similarity restraints are always used and they tend to remove TLS
contribution making final B-factors less adequate.
Pavel.
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb