I don't see a need for that right now. Delta (le page) is rather large, twin stats do not indicate twinning.

P

On 15 February 2015 at 06:27, Smith Liu <smith_liu123@163.com> wrote:
Dear All,

I have done a Xtriage twinning analysis on my data. I summarize the result as following,

Twinning analysis summary: The results of the L-test indicate that the intensity statistics below as expected. No twinning is suspected. Multivariate Z score L-test: 1.625.

It further shows, 

Possible twin operators 
o merohedral twin operator(s) found, 1 pseudo-merohedral twin operator(s) found.
Type       Axis    R metric(%)    delta(le Pa)      delta (lebed)   Twin law
PM        2-fold    4.934               2.547                  0.036        l -k h

Based on the above information, will you please advise me whether I need to input "l -k h" in the "Twin law" in "Other options" in "Refinement settings" in the Phenix refine graphical interface?

I am looking forward to getting your reply.

Smith





_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org



--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
P.H. Zwart
Staff Scientist
Berkeley Center for Structural Biology, Science lead
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories
1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA-94703, USA
Cell: 510 289 9246
SASTBX:  http://sastbx.als.lbl.gov
BCSB:      http://bcsb.als.lbl.gov
PHENIX:   http://www.phenix-online.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------