![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6d4350e0471a78c8959ecfec62d01f61.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
this assumes two domains, right? IIRC, every discussion of twinning i have read treats the problem in terms of two domains. what is the basis for only having two domains (besides simplicity)?
The twin law is a rotation operator. the order of that rotation (2fold, 3 fold, 4 fold, 6fold) determines the number of domains for a single twin law.
someone mentioned a three-domain twinning problem (maybe ccp4 or phenix bb, last week or so) - wouldn't that need "1-alpha-(third domain fraction)"?
yes! P
-bryan
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- P.H. Zwart Beamline Scientist Berkeley Center for Structural Biology Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA-94703, USA Cell: 510 289 9246 BCSB: http://bcsb.als.lbl.gov PHENIX: http://www.phenix-online.org CCTBX: http://cctbx.sf.net -----------------------------------------------------------------