Hi Kay,
0) I guess by FC you actually mean Fmodel, see page #6 here
http://www.phenix-online.org/presentations/latest/pavel_refinement_general.pdf
1)
you can ask phenix.refine to output Fcalc, Fmodel, Fbulk, FOM,
alpha, beta, TestFlags, Fobs etc...
Example that does just this (after bulk solvent correction and
anisotropic scaling):
phenix.refine model.pdb data.mtz strategy=none
main.number_of_macro_cycles=1 export_final_f_model=mtz
or
phenix.refine model.pdb data.mtz strategy=none
main.number_of_macro_cycles=1 export_final_f_model=mtz
2) I will add detailed R-factor statistics output as part of
phenix.model_vs_data tool.
3) phenix.refine chooses the amount of resolution bins based on
availability of free-R flags (so each relatively thin resolution
shell receives not less then ~150 test reflections). By the way,
"150" or so is the parameter that you can change. Apart from
cosmetics (the amount of output bins) this will influence the
refinement too.
Let me know what exactly you are trying to achieve and I will think
how we can accommodate it in available tools.
Pavel.
On 8/4/10 10:22 AM, Kay Diederichs wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to get the R-factor statistics from phenix.refine,
for a specific resolution range, e.g. 2.5-2.6A ? The reason I ask
is that I would like to specify the same resolution range as the
data reduction program does.
I tried with
phenix.reflection_statistics x_map_coeffs.mtz x_data.mtz
--low-resolution=2.6 --resolution=2.5
but with the default settings, phenix.refine writes 2FOFCWT and
FOFCWT, but not FC . So it looks like I have to re-run
phenix.refine and make it write out FC? Or is it easier to run
phenix.xmanip for that purpose?
thanks,
Kay
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb