Hi Tim,

If you are using Phenix 1.5.2, that would not have had the new bulk-solvent model that Pavel is talking about. Are you using that old of a version for your tests?

Jeff

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Pavel Afonine <pafonine@lbl.gov> wrote:
Hi Tim,

this is because recently (a few weeks ago) we introduced a novel bulk-solvent model and a new overall anisotropic scaling procedure.

Some detailed overview is here:

http://www.phenix-online.org/presentations/PhenixSantaFe2012_PA.pdf

This is going to be published soon.

Pavel


On 4/17/12 7:59 AM, Timothy Springer wrote:
In one of the structures I have refined, I found phenix 1.5_2 gave 1 to 1.5% lower Rfree and Rwork than  REFMAC 5.5.0102.  
Can I propose in a publication that  "We attribute these differences to methods for handling bulk solvent in PHENIX that are less adversely affected by deficiencies in the crystallographic data."? 
This is a guess, because there is a large contribution to refinement from bulk solvent, rather than factual information. I did cross-refinement, and found it going from structures refined in REfmac to Phenix, and vice versa. The Phenix maps looked better, too. 
Is this a reasonable suggestion, and would there be a relevant reference?
Tim


_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb