![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f3de86147d439720e7eb4802800a75be.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
9 Mar
2011
9 Mar
'11
6:18 p.m.
Hi Pavel, What I meant it was just that the 2mFo-2DFc map looks really great and corroborates experimental data as far as the stereochemistry. But I dont understand ehy the carbonyl moiety of the ligand would be where it is now, no "driving force to be here". And when I look at my averaged kick and SA omit map it looks ambiguous. Any help?