On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Mario Sanches
Pavel finally corrected it by using this server: http://services.mbi.ucla.edu/anisoscale/
wondering about a number of things on the topic of anisotropic diffraction vis-a-vis phenix : * what does any phenix subprogram do lately in this regard - truncate or scale, etc? i.e. why use the UCLA server at this point if it uses phaser anyways - just to truncate? is anisodisp.f a phaser subroutine? it is not clear to me what is going on in phenix - phaser applies aniso scaling all the time - does phenix.refine do this? what about with unmerged data as in autosol/autobuild? why? I also note that the Sawaya powerpoint shows over 30% of the original (merged?) data in the example is rejected. (not-so phenix-related): * would not anisotropic scaling/truncation be more appropriate to apply to unmerged data - although they have a program downloadable, the server does not run this. * mosflm has been able to run anisotropic scaling for a while (see below - worthwhile CCP4 thread). * does aimless (previously scala) run anisotropic scaling? (i'll ask on ccp4) ref: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12316.html -Bryan