what does this have to do with estimating ligand binding affinity? Does one have to have fairly low occupancy? I have examples where one end of a ligand is much better defined than the other end of the ligand, both ends are in the same pocket. The pocket has to reshape to accomodate high affinity binding. We have modeled complete occupancy, but B factors for example would differ and we go from two conformations in rather diffuse density to excellent density at the one end of the pocket, while at the other end there is always excellent density. It seems magical to convert this type of data to affinity, but if there was a way, I would be interested in trying it.
With my best regards,
Tim

Timothy A. Springer, Ph.D.                                    
Latham Family Professor of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology                                     
Harvard Medical School                   http://idi.harvard.edu/springer 
Immune Disease Institute                 [email protected]        
Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Dept. Medicine
Div. Hematology                                 Children's Hospital Boston
3 Blackfan Circle, Rm 3103              phone:  617-713-8200                
Boston MA 02115                               fax:        617-713-8232                










On May 1, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Nora Cronin wrote:

I'm having a small problem with format - entering fixed_ensembles in automr:

my input:

 fixed_ensembles {
   fixed_ensembleID_list = "ensemble_1"
   fixed_euler_list = 87.09  64.28 257.24
   fixed_frac_list = 0.540  0.079  0.069
   fixed_frac_list_is_fractional = True
 }

Phenix output:

Adding Ensemble  ensemble_1  as fixed solution with:
Euler angles:  [87.09, 64.28, 257.24]
Coords (orthogonal A):  [0.54, 0.079, 0.069]
*************ERROR ENDING *******************

****************************************
AutoMR Input failed
Python argument types in
   SOLU.addSOLU_6DIM_ENSE(InputMR_AUTO, str, list, bool, list, float, bool, bool, bool)
did not match C++ signature:
   addSOLU_6DIM_ENSE(phaser::SOLU {lvalue}, std::string, scitbx::vec3<double>, bool, scitbx::vec3<double>, double, bool, bool, bool, bool, scitbx::vec3<double>, double)
****************************************
*************ERROR ENDING *******************
[1


In addition to fixed two solutions is it necessary to repeat the key phrases or can one add to "fixed_euler_list" in groups of three (do they need to be comma delimited?


Nora



Dr N B Cronin
X-Ray Laboratory Manager               Tel. (+44) 020 7153 5445
Section of Structural Biology             Fax. (+44) 020 7153 5456
Chester Beatty Laboratories mobile: (+44) 07787554059
The Institute of Cancer Research     
237 Fulham Road                               
London
SW3 6JB


The Institute of Cancer Research: Royal Cancer Hospital, a charitable Company Limited by Guarantee, Registered in England under Company No. 534147 with its Registered Office at 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP.

This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only.  If the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer and network.
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb