At the risk of hijacking the thread, is the other type of "safety"
considered? Our university is cutting net access to unencrypted
computers, after now-publicized hacks originating from a foreign
country. They do not seem to understand or know solutions for
encrypting linux machines (they are also banishing XP; all FPLCs
may have to come offline!).
So, to cut to the chase, does anyone run RHEL/CentOS/Scientific
Linux on encrypted disks? I am assuming dm-crypt with LUKS would
be the way to go, and I would appreciate to hear about how easy it
is to set it up and maintain. Can this be done without wiping
clean the system? We are not system admins, and don't want to be.
Otherwise, we may be forced to switch entirely to Macs (a Mac OS X
Server as our SBGrid server?).
Thanks,
Engin
On 12/12/13, 8:32 AM, David Waterman
wrote:
CCP4 builds and tests on a handful of Linux
distributions, but the distributed binaries are, I think,
built on CentOS 5.9. I agree that RHEL derivatives are
"safest" for a crystallography platform.
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb