On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Leonid Flaks <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:flaks@bnl.gov">flaks@bnl.gov</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

I am running phenix 1.6.2-432 on a set of systems running 32-bit version of fedora-12. The latest version of phenix (1.6.3-473) has binaries mostly for 64-bit OS. The only 32-bit OS I see is fedora-3. I would be happy to switch to 64-bit OS one day, but HKL2000 that runs on the same computers has a big warning about instability of it on the 64-bit (it is dated back to 2005!) Coot is also crashing on the the 64-bit test system, so I have to stay with 32-bit for now.<br>


Does anybody know if fc-3 version would run on f-12?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I suspect it will be okay, but I haven&#39;t tested it.  It partly depends on which features will be used - the GUI is twitchier about system libraries on Linux.  Fortunately, we also distribute all of the source code for Phenix, so if the binary installer doesn&#39;t work, I&#39;d recommend switching to the source installer.  Are these the same machines (and OS) that were used for RapiData?</div>

<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Would it be possible to have 32-bit version built for f-12 or f-13?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Possibly - we are probably going to pull some machines from our queueing system because they have only 8 cores, and some of these will become build machines for additional platforms (64-bit Ubuntu and CentOS are candidates).  Also, we now build a CentOS 5 (similar to FC6) installer - it didn&#39;t work properly for 1.6.3, but I think I&#39;ve fixed it now, and we&#39;re going to push out a 1.6.4 very soon because of some unrelated problems in 1.6.3.</div>

<div><br></div><div>-Nat</div></div>