I am using 10.4.11 on OS X .
However, at the moment I am more interested in getting phenix to run correctly on my linux box: Fedora core 9, kernel 2.6.25.11-97.fc9.i686.
Thanks, Oliv

Paul Adams wrote:
Which version of OS X are you using? Is it earlier than 10.4.11?

On Jan 30, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Oliv Eidam wrote:

  
Hi,

I am currently refining a good 1.6 Angstroem data set using Phenix.
Thereby I noticed a significant difference of R-free (>3%) depending  
on
whether I used phenix version 1.3-rc6 (installed on my Mac laptop) or
phenix version 1.4-3 (installed on my linux work station). Rfree  
differs
by more than 3% (!) although I am using the same starting model, the
same reflection file and the same refinement protocol (shown at the  
end
of this email with detailed R and R-free factors for the 3 steps).
In my opinion, my phenix 1.4-3 installation has a problem in the "bulk
solvent modeling and scaling" steps. Indeed, I find in the log file  
that
the "overall anisotropic scale matrix" shows all values set to zero.
Analogous the "maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error". This
is true in all steps where an "overall anisotropic scale matrix" is
calculated.
Here is one example during 1.4-3 refinement:

====================== bulk solvent modeling and scaling
======================

|--(resolution: 1.61 - 29.59 A; n_refl. =
99535)------------------------------|
|
|
| r_work= 0.3419   r_free= 0.3358   ksol= 0.39   Bsol= 19.12   scale=
1.247   |
|
|
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis;
B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00,0.00); trace/3=
0.00                              |
|
|
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error:  -0.00
A                  |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections:
5.981207                   |
| 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

The same example during 1.3-rc6 refinement:

===================== bulk solvent correction and scaling
=====================

|-macro cycle = 1-(resolution: 1.61 - 29.59 A; n_refl. =
99537)---------------|
|
|
| r_work= 0.3153   r_free= 0.3064   ksol= 0.40   Bsol= 43.79   scale=
1.087   |
|
|
| overall anisotropic scale matrix (Cartesian basis;
B11,B22,B33,B12,B13,B23):|
| (-4.01,-5.36,-8.20,-0.00,2.74,0.00); trace/3=
-5.86                         |
|
|
| maximum likelihood estimate for coordinate error: 0.33
A                    |
| x-ray target function (ml) for work reflections:
5.946583                   |
| 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

I am asking now: Did something go wrong during my Phenix  
installation? I
already re-installed Phenix (no errors): same result. Do I have to
change something in my input files? I should probably mention that
"bulk_solvent_and_scale = True" in my input .def files.

Any help appreciated. Many thanks,

 Oliv


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Refinement protocol and development of R and Rfree during each
refinement round:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1)Rigid body refinement
2) Simulated annealing (5000K)
3) Ordered solvent (plus annealing @ 2000K)

phenix version 1.3-rc6:
1) R=31.5, Rf=30.6
2) R=23.9, Rf=25.8
3) R=19.8, Rf=22.0

phenix version 1.4-3:
1) R=31.6, Rf=30.6
2) R=27.8, Rf=29.8
3) R=23.7, Rf=25.2


-- 
Oliv Eidam, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral fellow

University of California, San Francisco
Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry
1700 4th Street, Byers Hall North, Room 501
San Francisco, CA 94158 - Box 2550

Phone: 415-514-4253
Fax  : 415-514-4260
Email: [email protected]



_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
    

  

-- 
Oliv Eidam, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral fellow

University of California, San Francisco
Dept. of Pharmaceutical Chemistry
1700 4th Street, Byers Hall North, Room 501
San Francisco, CA 94158 - Box 2550 

Phone: 415-514-4253
Fax  : 415-514-4260
Email: [email protected]