![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ea71c539cb4346ef7ccd8150c668f6ce.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
I guess that you could do it the with the tools that are available,
but would require some scripting to get it going, and will be
relatively slow and possibly not recommended.
phenix.refine allows the possibility to add distance restraints
between any atom specified:
http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/refinement.htm#anch281
what you could do, is take the high resolution structure you have,
find all 1-4 distances that you think should (not around the active
site) be invariant (this is the scripting bit) and write them out as a
custom bond with an appropriate sigma and feed this into
phenix.refine. This scheme is similar to the NCS restraints in shelx i
belive.
Again, this is possible, but not sure if recommended.
There are probably other (possibly better) ways of doing it as well.
Peter
2007/10/11, Frank von Delft
Hi, this was discussed some time ago (a few years?) on ccp4: is there a way (even a fudge) to restrain a refinement at low resolution to an existing (much) higher resolution model?
The scenario: you have a 1.9A structure, beautiful etc. You do a ligand soak, get 2.6A data, and only really want to see what's in the active site. This requires refinement (to improve phases), but most of the structure shouldn't change (often the case, especially if it's the the same crystal form). So you only want things to change that really are different.
Thanks phx _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb