Dear Phenix developers, I am working on a 3.6 A structure and want to try the latest joint development of phenix and rosetta. Is there are kind of "how_to" available online? Some do's and don'ts? Best, Guenter
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Guenter Fritz < [email protected]> wrote:
I am working on a 3.6 A structure and want to try the latest joint development of phenix and rosetta. Is there are kind of "how_to" available online? Some do's and don'ts?
Yes, it's not as complete as I'd like, but here is the current documentation: https://www.phenix-online.org/version_docs/dev-1506/rosetta_refine.htm Hopefully installation will be less traumatic in the near future - I need to do some more experimenting with our installers but I was holding back so we could release a new Phenix first. I think for the long term we will need to come up with a variety of "recipes" for using Rosetta - like phenix.refine, it is extremely flexible, but the default behavior is tuned for a specific class of problems. -Nat
Thanks a lot Nat, I have a try! Best regards, Guenter
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Guenter Fritz
mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I am working on a 3.6 A structure and want to try the latest joint development of phenix and rosetta. Is there are kind of "how_to" available online? Some do's and don'ts?
Yes, it's not as complete as I'd like, but here is the current documentation:
https://www.phenix-online.org/version_docs/dev-1506/rosetta_refine.htm
Hopefully installation will be less traumatic in the near future - I need to do some more experimenting with our installers but I was holding back so we could release a new Phenix first.
I think for the long term we will need to come up with a variety of "recipes" for using Rosetta - like phenix.refine, it is extremely flexible, but the default behavior is tuned for a specific class of problems.
-Nat
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
PS, in the paper you write that it only works with Rosetta 3.6; there is only Rosetta 3.5 so far. Should one use the latest build? Thanks, Guenter
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Guenter Fritz
mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I am working on a 3.6 A structure and want to try the latest joint development of phenix and rosetta. Is there are kind of "how_to" available online? Some do's and don'ts?
Yes, it's not as complete as I'd like, but here is the current documentation:
https://www.phenix-online.org/version_docs/dev-1506/rosetta_refine.htm
Hopefully installation will be less traumatic in the near future - I need to do some more experimenting with our installers but I was holding back so we could release a new Phenix first.
I think for the long term we will need to come up with a variety of "recipes" for using Rosetta - like phenix.refine, it is extremely flexible, but the default behavior is tuned for a specific class of problems.
-Nat
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Yes, you should download one of the weekly releases of Rosetta. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Guenter Fritz < [email protected]> wrote:
PS, in the paper you write that it only works with Rosetta 3.6; there is only Rosetta 3.5 so far. Should one use the latest build? Thanks, Guenter
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Guenter Fritz < [email protected]> wrote:
I am working on a 3.6 A structure and want to try the latest joint development of phenix and rosetta. Is there are kind of "how_to" available online? Some do's and don'ts?
Yes, it's not as complete as I'd like, but here is the current documentation:
https://www.phenix-online.org/version_docs/dev-1506/rosetta_refine.htm
Hopefully installation will be less traumatic in the near future - I need to do some more experimenting with our installers but I was holding back so we could release a new Phenix first.
I think for the long term we will need to come up with a variety of "recipes" for using Rosetta - like phenix.refine, it is extremely flexible, but the default behavior is tuned for a specific class of problems.
-Nat
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing [email protected]http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
So I'm guessing no RNA means no DNA either?
And no twin laws?
Cheers,
Morten
On 11 October 2013 20:01, Nathaniel Echols
Yes, you should download one of the weekly releases of Rosetta.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Guenter Fritz < [email protected]> wrote:
PS, in the paper you write that it only works with Rosetta 3.6; there is only Rosetta 3.5 so far. Should one use the latest build? Thanks, Guenter
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Guenter Fritz < [email protected]> wrote:
I am working on a 3.6 A structure and want to try the latest joint development of phenix and rosetta. Is there are kind of "how_to" available online? Some do's and don'ts?
Yes, it's not as complete as I'd like, but here is the current documentation:
https://www.phenix-online.org/version_docs/dev-1506/rosetta_refine.htm
Hopefully installation will be less traumatic in the near future - I need to do some more experimenting with our installers but I was holding back so we could release a new Phenix first.
I think for the long term we will need to come up with a variety of "recipes" for using Rosetta - like phenix.refine, it is extremely flexible, but the default behavior is tuned for a specific class of problems.
-Nat
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing [email protected]http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- Morten K Grøftehauge, PhD Pohl Group Durham University
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Morten Grøftehauge < [email protected]> wrote:
So I'm guessing no RNA means no DNA either? And no twin laws?
I think no nucleic acids at all, but I will double-check. I believe someone is working on fixing this limitation but apparently it's a huge undertaking. Twin laws could work in theory and we had the necessary code in there at one point, but we never actually tested it. I will see if we can restore this capability. -Nat
participants (3)
-
Guenter Fritz
-
Morten Grøftehauge
-
Nathaniel Echols