molprobity vs validation_cryoem
Hi guys, We are using phenix version 1.15.2-3472. We have executed molprobity using the command line: phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 /usr/local/phenix-1.15.2-3472/modules/cctbx_project/mmtbx/command_line/molprobity.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb pickle=True nproc=4 We have also executed validation_cryoem (here we have used both the GUI and the command line and both interfaces return the same result) phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 ./phenix/phenix/command_line/validation_cryoem.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb "path_to_map"/molprobity.mrc resolution=3.2 pickle=True What we do not fully understand is why the two commands return different results for molprobity. Are the default parameters different? For example, validation_cryoem reports as number of outliers "34" in the molprobity tab (model.geometry.angle.outliers) while molprobity reports 21 The test files are available at: 3Dmap: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i_LJfUN1z7amoyM1B2N1U0Y2VYODB6LWdLY1pwai... pdb file: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093775/ Thanks for the help
Sorry, In the previous email I sent a wrong link for the pdb file. The
rigth one is:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i_LJfUN1z7dEF6MHhzNEJvUEo2eUJCZmNRYUpfVF...
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:51 AM Roberto Marabini
Hi guys,
We are using phenix version 1.15.2-3472. We have executed molprobity using the command line:
phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 /usr/local/phenix-1.15.2-3472/modules/cctbx_project/mmtbx/command_line/molprobity.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb pickle=True nproc=4
We have also executed validation_cryoem (here we have used both the GUI and the command line and both interfaces return the same result)
phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 ./phenix/phenix/command_line/validation_cryoem.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb "path_to_map"/molprobity.mrc resolution=3.2 pickle=True
What we do not fully understand is why the two commands return different results for molprobity. Are the default parameters different?
For example, validation_cryoem reports as number of outliers "34" in the molprobity tab (model.geometry.angle.outliers) while molprobity reports 21
The test files are available at:
3Dmap: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i_LJfUN1z7amoyM1B2N1U0Y2VYODB6LWdLY1pwai... pdb file: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093775/
Thanks for the help
Hi Roberto,
The difference occurs because of using/not using CDL
(conformation-dependent library) modifications. In case of molprobity, CDL
is not used since it is not mentioned the pdb file header which lead us to
assume that it was refined without CDL. In case of cryoem_validation it is
used. To turn it off use "cdl=False" command-line parameter or locate this
flag in GUI. To turn it on for molprobity, add line
REMARK 3 CDL
to your pdb file.
Best regards,
Oleg Sobolev.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:14 AM Roberto Marabini
Sorry, In the previous email I sent a wrong link for the pdb file. The rigth one is:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i_LJfUN1z7dEF6MHhzNEJvUEo2eUJCZmNRYUpfVF...
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:51 AM Roberto Marabini
wrote: Hi guys,
We are using phenix version 1.15.2-3472. We have executed molprobity using the command line:
phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 /usr/local/phenix-1.15.2-3472/modules/cctbx_project/mmtbx/command_line/molprobity.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb pickle=True nproc=4
We have also executed validation_cryoem (here we have used both the GUI and the command line and both interfaces return the same result)
phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 ./phenix/phenix/command_line/validation_cryoem.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb "path_to_map"/molprobity.mrc resolution=3.2 pickle=True
What we do not fully understand is why the two commands return different results for molprobity. Are the default parameters different?
For example, validation_cryoem reports as number of outliers "34" in the molprobity tab (model.geometry.angle.outliers) while molprobity reports 21
The test files are available at:
3Dmap: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i_LJfUN1z7amoyM1B2N1U0Y2VYODB6LWdLY1pwai... pdb file: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093775/
Thanks for the help
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected]
Thanks for the explanation.
roberto
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 4:03 PM Oleg Sobolev
Hi Roberto,
The difference occurs because of using/not using CDL (conformation-dependent library) modifications. In case of molprobity, CDL is not used since it is not mentioned the pdb file header which lead us to assume that it was refined without CDL. In case of cryoem_validation it is used. To turn it off use "cdl=False" command-line parameter or locate this flag in GUI. To turn it on for molprobity, add line REMARK 3 CDL to your pdb file.
Best regards, Oleg Sobolev.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:14 AM Roberto Marabini
wrote: Sorry, In the previous email I sent a wrong link for the pdb file. The rigth one is:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i_LJfUN1z7dEF6MHhzNEJvUEo2eUJCZmNRYUpfVF...
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:51 AM Roberto Marabini
wrote: Hi guys,
We are using phenix version 1.15.2-3472. We have executed molprobity using the command line:
phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 /usr/local/phenix-1.15.2-3472/modules/cctbx_project/mmtbx/command_line/molprobity.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb pickle=True nproc=4
We have also executed validation_cryoem (here we have used both the GUI and the command line and both interfaces return the same result)
phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 ./phenix/phenix/command_line/validation_cryoem.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb "path_to_map"/molprobity.mrc resolution=3.2 pickle=True
What we do not fully understand is why the two commands return different results for molprobity. Are the default parameters different?
For example, validation_cryoem reports as number of outliers "34" in the molprobity tab (model.geometry.angle.outliers) while molprobity reports 21
The test files are available at:
3Dmap: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i_LJfUN1z7amoyM1B2N1U0Y2VYODB6LWdLY1pwai... pdb file: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093775/
Thanks for the help
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected]
participants (2)
-
Oleg Sobolev
-
Roberto Marabini