Re: [phenixbb] metal coordination restrain on alternative conformation
Hi Nigel,
Another question. How do I let phenix.refine know that all atoms in my
ligand should have the same occupancy for one conformation? The occupancy
refinement in phenix.refine assigned different occupancies to atoms in one
conformation.
Thanks
Yu
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Zhang yu
Thanks
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Nigel Moriarty
wrote: I ran
phenix.metal_coordination
and got the attached. Pass it to phenix.refine.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Zhang yu
wrote: Hi Nigel,
Thanks. Please see attached PDB file. The structure has two molecules in one ASU. Each of molecule contains 6 protein chains and three Nucleic-acid chains (i.e. chain A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I for molecule 1; chain K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, and S for molecule 2)
There is only one nucleoside-triphosphate and its cognate MG++ in each molecule having alternative conformations (named as conformation A and B). The desired restrains are as follows,
In molecule 1, atom_selection_1 = name MG,B and chain N and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name OD2 and chain N and resname ASP and resseq 739 distance_ideal = 2.090000
atom_selection_1 = name MG,B and chain N and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name O3G, B and chain S and resname CMP and resseq 2001 distance_ideal = 2.090000
atom_selection_1 = name MG,B and chain N and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name O1B,B and chain S and resname CMP and resseq 2001 distance_ideal = 2.090000
atom_selection_1 = name MG,A and chain N and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name O1B,A and chain S and resname CMP and resseq 2001 distance_ideal = 2.090000
atom_selection_1 = name MG,A and chain N and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name O1G,A and chain S and resname CMP and resseq 2001 distance_ideal = 2.090000
In molecule 2, atom_selection_1 = name MG,B and chain D and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name OD2 and chain D and resname ASP and resseq 739 distance_ideal = 2.090000
atom_selection_1 = name MG,B and chain D and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name O3G, B and chain I and resname CMP and resseq 2001 distance_ideal = 2.090000
atom_selection_1 = name MG,B and chain D and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name O1B,B and chain I and resname CMP and resseq 2001 distance_ideal = 2.090000
atom_selection_1 = name MG,A and chain D and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name O1B,A and chain I and resname CMP and resseq 2001 distance_ideal = 2.090000
atom_selection_1 = name MG,A and chain D and resname MG and resseq 2004 atom_selection_2 = name O1G,A and chain I and resname CMP and resseq 2001 distance_ideal = 2.090000
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Nigel Moriarty
wrote: Can you send the residues involved?
Nigel
NB. Any files sent to me will be held in strictest confidence.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Zhang yu
wrote: Hi everyone,
My structure contains a metal coordinating to some residues, one of which has alternative conformations. Phenix doesn't pickup the residue with alternative conformation when I tried to generate metal restrains using ready.set.
Any idea? Thanks
Yu
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 64R0246B, Physical Biosciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : [email protected] Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 64R0246B, Physical Biosciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : [email protected] Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov
Hi Yu, have you already read section of phenix.refine manual that (I hope) answers your questions in details? If not - please give it a try, and if you still have questions please let me know and I will be more than happy to help. http://phenix-online.org/documentation/refinement.htm#anch111 Pavel On 10/3/13 12:27 PM, Zhang yu wrote:
Hi Nigel,
Another question. How do I let phenix.refine know that all atoms in my ligand should have the same occupancy for one conformation? The occupancy refinement in phenix.refine assigned different occupancies to atoms in one conformation.
Thanks
Yu
Hi Pavel,
It is embarrassing that I didn't read this section at all. I was searching
around in the GUI and failed to set the constraint group for occupancy, but
I am able to run it correctly by command now guided by the documentation.
Thanks
Yu
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Pavel Afonine
Hi Yu,
have you already read section of phenix.refine manual that (I hope) answers your questions in details? If not - please give it a try, and if you still have questions please let me know and I will be more than happy to help.
http://phenix-online.org/**documentation/refinement.htm#**anch111http://phenix-online.org/documentation/refinement.htm#anch111
Pavel
On 10/3/13 12:27 PM, Zhang yu wrote:
Hi Nigel,
Another question. How do I let phenix.refine know that all atoms in my ligand should have the same occupancy for one conformation? The occupancy refinement in phenix.refine assigned different occupancies to atoms in one conformation.
Thanks
Yu
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Zhang yu
It is embarrassing that I didn't read this section at all. I was searching around in the GUI and failed to set the constraint group for occupancy, but I am able to run it correctly by command now guided by the documentation.
Can you please clarify what you tried in the GUI that didn't work? If it's not letting you constrain the occupancy that may be a bug. thanks, Nat
Hi Nat,
Never mind. The GUI woks well after I fixed my selection errors.
Thanks
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Nathaniel Echols
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Zhang yu
wrote: It is embarrassing that I didn't read this section at all. I was searching around in the GUI and failed to set the constraint group for occupancy, but I am able to run it correctly by command now guided by the documentation.
Can you please clarify what you tried in the GUI that didn't work? If it's not letting you constrain the occupancy that may be a bug.
thanks, Nat
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
participants (3)
-
Nathaniel Echols
-
Pavel Afonine
-
Zhang yu