![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/21dd0e366ab2a027ba887d4d93c1860b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Dear Phenix developers, I am SO impressed with what AutoSol (thank you TT) did with some old heavy atom data sets I collected on tetragonal lysozyme some years ago; one was a single-site uranium derivative and the other a pretty dodgy mercury derivative and just the sequence. Neither had any separation of anomalous pairs, so it was totally MIR. In an hour and a half, there was a gorgeous map (not perfect mind you, CC = 0.85, but our students will not realize how much more work this would have been 20 years ago or even 10). I was just curious which statistic in the log file could be compared with the old fashioned "phasing power"? THanks Laurie Betts UNC Chapel Hill
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7a928079d4d5d1b6b227c1c0e2aa2da8.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi Laurie, I'm glad that autosol did well on your old datasets! The "phasing power" for autosol can be found in the files AutoSol_run_1_/TEMP0/solve_1.prt , solve_2.prt etc (with each derivative in one file) where you can find: RMS(FH)/RMS(E): 3.77 1.87 3.89 4.09 4.62 5.66 4.76 5.11 4.75 which is one expression for phasing power. All the best, Tom T
Dear Phenix developers,
I am SO impressed with what AutoSol (thank you TT) did with some old heavy atom data sets I collected on tetragonal lysozyme some years ago; one was a single-site uranium derivative and the other a pretty dodgy mercury derivative and just the sequence. Neither had any separation of anomalous pairs, so it was totally MIR. In an hour and a half, there was a gorgeous map (not perfect mind you, CC = 0.85, but our students will not realize how much more work this would have been 20 years ago or even 10).
I was just curious which statistic in the log file could be compared with the old fashioned "phasing power"?
THanks
Laurie Betts UNC Chapel Hill _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/21dd0e366ab2a027ba887d4d93c1860b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Great! Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Thomas C. Terwilliger wrote: Hi Laurie, I'm glad that autosol did well on your old datasets! The "phasing power"
for autosol can be found in the files AutoSol_run_1_/TEMP0/solve_1.prt ,
solve_2.prt etc (with each derivative in one file) where you can find: RMS(FH)/RMS(E): 3.77 1.87 3.89 4.09 4.62 5.66 4.76 5.11
4.75 which is one expression for phasing power. All the best,
Tom T Dear Phenix developers, I am SO impressed with what AutoSol (thank you TT) did with some old
heavy
atom data sets I collected on tetragonal lysozyme some years ago; one
was
a
single-site uranium derivative and the other a pretty dodgy mercury
derivative and just the sequence. Neither had any separation of
anomalous
pairs, so it was totally MIR. In an hour and a half, there was a
gorgeous
map (not perfect mind you, CC = 0.85, but our students will not realize
how
much more work this would have been 20 years ago or even 10). I was just curious which statistic in the log file could be compared
with
the old fashioned "phasing power"? THanks Laurie Betts
UNC Chapel Hill
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb _______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
participants (2)
-
Laurie Betts
-
Thomas C. Terwilliger