Did phaser get OpenMP/parallelized or was I just having a dream? If so, how's it work? Thanks FR --------------------------------------------- Francis Reyes M.Sc. 215 UCB University of Colorado at Boulder gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 67BA8D5D 8AE2 F2F4 90F7 9640 28BC 686F 78FD 6669 67BA 8D5D
I have been working in a pseudo-merohedrally twinned for some time, and I have finally refined the structure to a good model. By the time I was still struggling with it, I have noticed that there was a discrepancy between the reflection count in the mtz file and the one reported in the PDB, but since I stopped working on it for some months I forgot the issue, which was pointed by RCSB staff when I deposited the data. The mtz file generated by phenix.refine using the export_final_f_model=mtz option has 47331 reflections according to mtzdump. However, the "DATAPDB file generated ____________________________________________________________________________________ Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
I have been working in a pseudo-merohedrally twinned for some time, and I have finally refined the structure to a good model. By the time I was still struggling with it, I have noticed that there was a discrepancy between the reflection count in the mtz file and the one reported in the PDB, but since I stopped working on it for some months I forgot the issue, which was pointed by RCSB staff when I deposited the data. The mtz file generated by phenix.refine using the export_final_f_model=mtz option has 47331 reflections according to mtzdump. However, the "DATA USED IN REFINEMENT" section in the refined PDB says "NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS: 85360" What causes this discrepancy? Thanks in advance, Lucas Bleicher ____________________________________________________________________________________ Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
OK, looking at the second portion of your email, I guess this is because the F+ and F- are counted separately? Ralf, do you have comments? Pavel. On 10/7/09 5:17 PM, Lucas Bleicher wrote:
I have been working in a pseudo-merohedrally twinned for some time, and I have finally refined the structure to a good model. By the time I was still struggling with it, I have noticed that there was a discrepancy between the reflection count in the mtz file and the one reported in the PDB, but since I stopped working on it for some months I forgot the issue, which was pointed by RCSB staff when I deposited the data.
The mtz file generated by phenix.refine using the export_final_f_model=mtz option has 47331 reflections according to mtzdump. However, the "DATA USED IN REFINEMENT" section in the refined PDB says "NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS: 85360"
What causes this discrepancy?
Thanks in advance, Lucas Bleicher
____________________________________________________________________________________ Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
The mtz file generated by phenix.refine using the export_final_f_model=mtz option has 47331 reflections according to mtzdump. However, the "DATA USED IN REFINEMENT" section in the refined PDB says "NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS: 85360"
Do you have anomalous data? The mtz file stores the Miller indices hkl only for a hemisphere. phenix.refine puts F(+) and F(-) together, which roughly doubles the reflection count. Ralf
It seems to be the case - the mtz has different columns for F(+) and F(-), but since both are in the same h k l, they are counted as a single reflection.
Thanks,
Lucas
--- Em qua, 7/10/09, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
The mtz file generated by
De: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
Assunto: Re: [phenixbb] Reflection count Para: [email protected], [email protected] Data: Quarta-feira, 7 de Outubro de 2009, 21:24 phenix.refine using the export_final_f_model=mtz option has 47331 reflections according to mtzdump. However, the "DATA USED IN REFINEMENT" section in the refined PDB says "NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS: 85360"
Do you have anomalous data? The mtz file stores the Miller indices hkl only for a hemisphere. phenix.refine puts F(+) and F(-) together, which roughly doubles the reflection count. Ralf
____________________________________________________________________________________ Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
Hi Lucas, the reflection output by "export_final_f_model" option may be truncated by the resolution, sigma etc (if you used those criteria). Also, phenix.refine does automatic detection and removing of outliers, so that file will not contain them too. Using your original files or *_data.mtz generated by phenix.refine is much better option. Also, it depends how you count Fobs(+) and Fobs(-) (if you have any). Pavel. On 10/7/09 5:15 PM, Lucas Bleicher wrote:
I have been working in a pseudo-merohedrally twinned for some time, and I have finally refined the structure to a good model. By the time I was still struggling with it, I have noticed that there was a discrepancy between the reflection count in the mtz file and the one reported in the PDB, but since I stopped working on it for some months I forgot the issue, which was pointed by RCSB staff when I deposited the data.
The mtz file generated by phenix.refine using the export_final_f_model=mtz option has 47331 reflections according to mtzdump. However, the "DATAPDB file generated
____________________________________________________________________________________ Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
participants (4)
-
Francis E Reyes
-
Lucas Bleicher
-
Pavel Afonine
-
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve