Low resolution refinement
Dear all, I have got a very promising MR solution at 5A resolution. Can I refine this structure? Any hint would be very much appreciated Armando
Hi Armando,
I have got a very promising MR solution at 5A resolution. Can I refine this structure? Any hint would be very much appreciated
this is a low resolution indeed, so modeling and refinement is likely to be challenging. All the standard 'low-resolution refinement' advises apply here. Since there are few data (low-res) you need to employ as much 'a priori' known information as possible, in form of restraints or/and constraints. Those typically include: - If NCS is present, use NCS constraints (yes, constraints, not restraints, as at this resolution you are highly unlikely to see data-supported genuine differences between NCS copies!); - if similar homologous models obtained at higher resolution are available -- try using them as reference models; - Use secondary structure restraints. Important: make sure to obtain secondary structure annotation as accurately as possible. - Use Ramachandran plot restraints (to avoid appearing outliers during refinement, not to fix existing ones!); - Avoid stretching your imagination by adding model in the absence of density; - At this resolution refining group B factors (two B per residue) may be a good idea. Let me know if you have any more specific questions! Good luck! Pavel
Also, these days I would recommend using an AlphaFold2 model as a reference model, unless you have the structure of a very closely-related homologue. Randy
On 16 Nov 2021, at 20:58, Pavel Afonine
wrote: Hi Armando,
I have got a very promising MR solution at 5A resolution. Can I refine this structure? Any hint would be very much appreciated
this is a low resolution indeed, so modeling and refinement is likely to be challenging. All the standard 'low-resolution refinement' advises apply here. Since there are few data (low-res) you need to employ as much 'a priori' known information as possible, in form of restraints or/and constraints. Those typically include:
- If NCS is present, use NCS constraints (yes, constraints, not restraints, as at this resolution you are highly unlikely to see data-supported genuine differences between NCS copies!);
- if similar homologous models obtained at higher resolution are available -- try using them as reference models;
- Use secondary structure restraints. Important: make sure to obtain secondary structure annotation as accurately as possible.
- Use Ramachandran plot restraints (to avoid appearing outliers during refinement, not to fix existing ones!);
- Avoid stretching your imagination by adding model in the absence of density;
- At this resolution refining group B factors (two B per residue) may be a good idea.
Let me know if you have any more specific questions!
Good luck! Pavel
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected]
----- Randy J. Read Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500 The Keith Peters Building Fax: +44 1223 336827 Hills Road E-mail: [email protected] Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
Thank you all, The MR solution comes from an alphaFold model. It packs well, it provides a sensible (biological) oligomer and a reasonable electron density (tubes for alpha helices). In any case, I am not sure about the solution. Phaser refinement seems to work and I wonder if I can progress with phenix.refine (or any other). Armando
El 17 nov 2021, a las 12:51, Randy John Read
escribió: Also, these days I would recommend using an AlphaFold2 model as a reference model, unless you have the structure of a very closely-related homologue.
Randy
On 16 Nov 2021, at 20:58, Pavel Afonine
wrote: Hi Armando,
I have got a very promising MR solution at 5A resolution. Can I refine this structure? Any hint would be very much appreciated
this is a low resolution indeed, so modeling and refinement is likely to be challenging. All the standard 'low-resolution refinement' advises apply here. Since there are few data (low-res) you need to employ as much 'a priori' known information as possible, in form of restraints or/and constraints. Those typically include:
- If NCS is present, use NCS constraints (yes, constraints, not restraints, as at this resolution you are highly unlikely to see data-supported genuine differences between NCS copies!);
- if similar homologous models obtained at higher resolution are available -- try using them as reference models;
- Use secondary structure restraints. Important: make sure to obtain secondary structure annotation as accurately as possible.
- Use Ramachandran plot restraints (to avoid appearing outliers during refinement, not to fix existing ones!);
- Avoid stretching your imagination by adding model in the absence of density;
- At this resolution refining group B factors (two B per residue) may be a good idea.
Let me know if you have any more specific questions!
Good luck! Pavel
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected]
----- Randy J. Read Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500 The Keith Peters Building Fax: +44 1223 336827 Hills Road E-mail: [email protected] Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
For the most part, the AlphaFold models tend to be locally pretty good, so at low resolution it will be a good idea to use the original AlphaFold model as a reference model. Because the restraints are in terms of torsion angles, things like domain reorientations can take place even with the restraints present. Tristan Croll has been playing with AlphaFold models for rebuilding low-resolution structures in his ISOLDE plugin to ChimeraX, and he’s finding that they make low resolution work much easier in general. Best wishes, Randy
On 17 Nov 2021, at 12:54, Armando Albert
wrote: Thank you all, The MR solution comes from an alphaFold model. It packs well, it provides a sensible (biological) oligomer and a reasonable electron density (tubes for alpha helices). In any case, I am not sure about the solution. Phaser refinement seems to work and I wonder if I can progress with phenix.refine (or any other). Armando
El 17 nov 2021, a las 12:51, Randy John Read
escribió: Also, these days I would recommend using an AlphaFold2 model as a reference model, unless you have the structure of a very closely-related homologue.
Randy
On 16 Nov 2021, at 20:58, Pavel Afonine
wrote: Hi Armando,
I have got a very promising MR solution at 5A resolution. Can I refine this structure? Any hint would be very much appreciated
this is a low resolution indeed, so modeling and refinement is likely to be challenging. All the standard 'low-resolution refinement' advises apply here. Since there are few data (low-res) you need to employ as much 'a priori' known information as possible, in form of restraints or/and constraints. Those typically include:
- If NCS is present, use NCS constraints (yes, constraints, not restraints, as at this resolution you are highly unlikely to see data-supported genuine differences between NCS copies!);
- if similar homologous models obtained at higher resolution are available -- try using them as reference models;
- Use secondary structure restraints. Important: make sure to obtain secondary structure annotation as accurately as possible.
- Use Ramachandran plot restraints (to avoid appearing outliers during refinement, not to fix existing ones!);
- Avoid stretching your imagination by adding model in the absence of density;
- At this resolution refining group B factors (two B per residue) may be a good idea.
Let me know if you have any more specific questions!
Good luck! Pavel
_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected]
----- Randy J. Read Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500 The Keith Peters Building Fax: +44 1223 336827 Hills Road E-mail: [email protected] Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
----- Randy J. Read Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: +44 1223 336500 The Keith Peters Building Fax: +44 1223 336827 Hills Road E-mail: [email protected] Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk
participants (3)
-
Armando Albert
-
Pavel Afonine
-
Randy John Read