-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Calculating a 2 A resolution map on a 3 A grid is not the same as calculating a 6 A resolution truncated map at a 3 A grid. An FFT program will not calculate a 3 A grid map for a higher resolution data set because the algorithm insists on preserving information and such a course grid cannot hold all the data of a 2 A dataset. What you could do is calculate your map on a 1 A grid using an FFT and write a little program to throw away two of every three grid points. Or you could find a direct summation FT program that will be happy to calculate density values where ever you want. On the other hand, you should really think about why you want to do this. The reason there isn't a ready and simple solution to calculate this map for you is most people conclude that it isn't a good idea. Without knowing your application I'll withhold judgement, but you do lose a lot of information by sampling this coarsely and high resolution information is usually useful if you have it. Dale Tronrud On 1/30/2015 6:57 AM, Terwilliger, Thomas Charles wrote:

Hi Scott,

You can use the reflection file converter in the GUI to write out map coefficients with any resolution cutoff that you like. That may be the easiest. Alternatively you can take your refined model and use phenix.maps to calculate a map at any resolution that you like without further refinement.

You might also consider just adjusting the sharpening on your map which will have something of the same effect as cutting the resolution.

All the best, Tom T

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:* [email protected]

[[email protected]] on behalf of Scott Horowitz [[email protected]] *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2015 6:09 AM *To:* PHENIX user mailing list *Subject:* [phenixbb] making course maps

Hi all,

Although I realize this sounds counterproductive, I'd really like to be able to make a map with grid spacing that is around 3 A, even though I have a ~2 A structure, and I don't want to have to cut data before refinement. However, it seems like the max number I can give to the grid resolution factor is 0.5. Is there a way to break this limit without it crashing?

Thanks, Scott

-- Scott Horowitz, Ph.D. Research Associate Howard Hughes Medical Institute

University of Michigan Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology Bardwell lab 830 N. University Ave, Room 4007 Ann Arbor, MI 48109 phone: 734-647-6683 fax: 734-615-4226

_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAlTL0lgACgkQU5C0gGfAG11D6gCgryG44f7wCPW6w6JpSLMd5ELC LKsAoLB/EF57tcpTa1JktHYeh+U1cvi9 =ZCpY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----