![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/57a68523afc770a75f87a328280a22f9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, I wonder if anyone else has had trouble running both Phenix and HKL2000 on the same linux workstation? Once Phenix we have installed and used Phenix, the HKL2000 cr_info license becomes invalid, and vice versa. A linux guru suggested in passing that our bash system has a 'license' file that gives the directories of the licenses somewhere, and that this file needs both license directories added explicitly. But where would this file be? Thanks for the help! Clara
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/0c8c49a5ade41b1605d56316bfb2289c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Dear Clara, I have used HKL2000 and Phenix on the same linux workstation without problem. HKL2000 wanted its license file in /usr/local/lib and I have not had to edit any "license file" in bash. I am not aware that bash cares if HKL2000 has a license and I know that /usr/local/lib is built into HKL2000 so it doesn't ask bash about locations. I suggest you restore your cr_info file with a good copy and protect it from writing by users. Then when something attempts to corrupt it you should find out right at the time. Dale Tronrud ckielkop wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone else has had trouble running both Phenix and HKL2000 on the same linux workstation?
Once Phenix we have installed and used Phenix, the HKL2000 cr_info license becomes invalid, and vice versa. A linux guru suggested in passing that our bash system has a 'license' file that gives the directories of the licenses somewhere, and that this file needs both license directories added explicitly. But where would this file be?
Thanks for the help!
Clara _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
participants (2)
-
ckielkop
-
Dale Tronrud