[cctbxbb] Removal of Boost.Thread support

Nathaniel Echols nechols at lbl.gov
Thu Aug 16 11:11:59 PDT 2012


On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jeffrey Van Voorst <vanv0059 at umn.edu> wrote:
> I thought multiprocessing was to get around the issues of the GIL and use
> processes instead of threads, but provide the same (or as similar as
> possible) api as the threading module.

Correct, the problem is that we use the multiprocessing module to
launch jobs from the Phenix GUI.

-Nat


More information about the cctbxbb mailing list