[cctbxbb] Structure factor calculation weirdness

Jon Wright wright at esrf.fr
Fri Dec 7 13:58:40 PST 2012


On 07/12/2012 16:36, Graeme.Winter at diamond.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi Folks,
...

> spgroup = 'Fd-3m'
...

> Chopped out only 001, 010, 100 from this…

Since those are all systematic absences, what are their magnitudes in 
comparsion to the 111 which should be present?

Jon


More information about the cctbxbb mailing list