[cctbxbb] Python documentation
dgwaterman at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 07:17:53 PDT 2012
Thanks. I'm not desperate to see updated docs, just to get an idea of how
to proceed. But it sounds as though regeneration is about due anyway.
On 8 October 2012 14:47, Nathaniel Echols <nechols at lbl.gov> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:48 AM, David Waterman <dgwaterman at gmail.com>
> > I've got a few questions about the automatically generated Python
> > documentation.
> > ...
> > 3. Similarly, what determines which packages are documented or not? For
> > example, from http://cctbx.sourceforge.net/current/python/rstbx.html,
> > is documented but bpcx is not. Is there at some point a manual decision
> > about what should be documented?
> I think the partial answer is that the while the documentation is
> automatically generated, it is only updated on demand - i.e. someone
> needs to run a script to rebuild the online docs. Not surprisingly,
> this hasn't been done since at least May. I'll see if I can figure
> out how to do this today (which may help answer the other questions).
> cctbxbb mailing list
> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cctbxbb