[cctbxbb] which cctbx version is recommended now?

[Nathaniel Echols]

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Marcin Wojdyr <wojdyr at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, we need to pick a version of cctbx for CCP4 for use in phaser and
> DIALS.
> The latest logs at
> cci.lbl.gov/cctbx_build/show_error_summary.cgi?build_tag=2014_10_05_2205
> show in all builds:
>
> [Errno 2] No such file or directory
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ImportError: __import__("boost_python_meta_ext"): No module named
> boost_python_meta_ext
>

This was an attempt to do something clever that backfired - it's fixed
now.  There are still some errors in the current test logs that I need to
look at, and some issues with our build machines, but otherwise everything
should be reasonably stable.

Is it better to pick older version?
>

In this case it might be worth going back a few days.  I was hoping to have
a new "release" (a meaningless term in the context of CCTBX, but apparently
we're expected to do this) online soon, but the 32-bit Windows build is
currently MIA and we need to get that working first.  However, for CCP4's
purposes I think everything you use is relatively stable (but check with
the DIALS developers too).  It's mostly modules like mmtbx that are
unstable, but I don't think Phaser uses that.

-Nat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/cctbxbb/attachments/20141007/2053adb0/attachment.htm>