luc_j_bourhis at mac.com
Tue Jan 12 01:32:12 PST 2016
> On 12 Jan 2016, at 09:22, Graeme.Winter at Diamond.ac.uk wrote:
> I would think for CCTBX the argument would be even stronger, as it’s needed all over the place (dials, ccp4, phenix, olex2…) and so having the flexibility offered by much easier and more reliable branching would be very useful.
I definitively agree with that statement and your experience is definitively encouraging. It’s just that I remember a discussion with Ralf in which git was dismissed as a tool for geeks and the decision was made that I should use git svn if I wanted to use git.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cctbxbb