[cctbxbb] Boost Python 1.56

[Billy Poon]

Hi all,

I tested Boost 1.56 on our buildbot servers and got some new test failures
with

cctbx_project/scitbx/array_family/boost_python/tst_flex.py
cctbx_project/scitbx/random/tests/tst_random.py

The full log for CentOS 6 can be found at

http://cci-vm-6.lbl.gov:8010/builders/phenix-nightly-intel-linux-2.6-x86_64-centos6/builds/601/steps/test%20cctbx_regression.test_nightly/logs/stdio

It looks like the errors are related to random number generation. For a
given seed, would the sequence of numbers change when Boost is changed? I
did a diff between Boost 1.56 and the current Boost and could not see any
changes that immediately stood out as being related to random numbers.

Are these tests failing for others as well?

--
Billy K. Poon
Research Scientist, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1 Cyclotron Road, M/S 33R0345
Berkeley, CA 94720
Tel: (510) 486-5709
Fax: (510) 486-5909
Web: https://phenix-online.org

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Charles Ballard <charles.ballard at stfc.ac.uk>
wrote:

> FYI,  we (CCP4) have been using 1.56 for building cctbx/phaser/dials for
> the last while with no issues.  Don't know about 1.60, but 1.59 causes
> issues with the boost python make_getter and make_setter (initialisation of
> none const reference if the passed type is a temporary).
>
> Charles
>
> On 3 Apr 2017, at 14:31, Luc Bourhis wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> everybody seemed to agree but then it was proposed to move straight to
> Boost 1.60, and this caused troubles. Could we consider again to move to at
> least 1.56? As far as I can tell, this does not cause any issue and as
> stated one year ago, it would help me and Olex 2.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Luc
>
> On 10 Feb 2016, at 15:17, Nicholas Sauter <nksauter at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> Nigel, Billy & Aaron,
>
> I completely endorse this move to Boost 1.56.  Can we update our build?
>
> Nick
>
> Nicholas K. Sauter, Ph. D.
> Computer Staff Scientist, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging
> Division
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
> 1 Cyclotron Rd., Bldg. 33R0345
> Berkeley, CA 94720
> (510) 486-5713
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Luc Bourhis <luc_j_bourhis at mac.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have improvements to the smtbx on their way to be committed which
>> require Boost version 1.56. This is related to Boost.Threads, whose support
>> I re-activated a few months ago on Nick’s request. I need the function
>> boost::thread::physical_concurrency which returns the number of physical
>> cores on the machine, as opposed to virtual cores when hyperthreading is
>> enabled (which it is by default on any Intel machine). That function is not
>> available in Boost 1.55 which is the version currently used in the nightly
>> tests: it appeared in 1.56.
>>
>> So, would it be possible to move to Boost 1.56? Otherwise, I will need to
>> backport that function. Not too difficult but not thrilling.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Luc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cctbxbb mailing list
>> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cctbxbb mailing list
> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cctbxbb mailing list
> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cctbxbb mailing list
> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/cctbxbb/attachments/20170405/1c13ffba/attachment.htm>