[cctbxbb] Boost Python 1.56

[Billy Poon]

Hi Marcin,

Thanks! I forgot the recursive flag for diff. I thought it was odd that
there weren't that many differences between the 2 source trees.

We can update the tests when we make the move to 1.56.

Also, I'm assuming that we want to just use the standard 1.56 tarball.

--
Billy K. Poon
Research Scientist, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1 Cyclotron Road, M/S 33R0345
Berkeley, CA 94720
Tel: (510) 486-5709
Fax: (510) 486-5909
Web: https://phenix-online.org

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Marcin Wojdyr <wojdyr at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 5 April 2017 at 23:37, Billy Poon <bkpoon at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> > It looks like the errors are related to random number generation. For a
> > given seed, would the sequence of numbers change when Boost is changed? I
> > did a diff between Boost 1.56 and the current Boost and could not see any
> > changes that immediately stood out as being related to random numbers.
> >
> > Are these tests failing for others as well?
> >
>
> Hi Billy,
> perhaps it's this change in boost/random/normal_distribution.hpp:
> https://github.com/boostorg/random/commit/f0ec97ba36c05ef00f2d29dcf66094
> e3f4abdcde
> _______________________________________________
> cctbxbb mailing list
> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/cctbxbb/attachments/20170405/d73b0884/attachment.htm>