[cctbxbb] simtbx - Pilatus example available

[Aaron Brewster]

Hi James, I went with 'cctbx-staging'.  Here's what I did:

git pull
git checkout simtbx_sandbox
git log # note the hashes for the two commits
git checkout master
git checkout -b cctbx-staging
git cherry-pick 728e4daec5b20f15ff67263b85487c212455448b
53b7cf50a5be7f275ce6980171465360ec93b9ab
git push -u origin cctbx-staging

Ready to be tested with Jenkins.

-Aaron





On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:38 AM, James Holton <jmholton at lbl.gov> wrote:

> Sounds good to me.  Assuming I'm not the only one who would like to do
> test Jenkins runs without breaking the master branch, perhaps
> cctbx-playground is the branch to use?
>
> -James
>
> On 4/8/2018 9:13 AM, Aaron Brewster wrote:
>
> Hi James, I’ve looked at it. The branch still has my test commit that
> breaks Windows in it. That’s the demo commit we made to test Jenkins. I’ll
> cherry pick your two commits into a new branch later today.  Maybe we can
> point Jenkins at that branch instead?
>
> -Aaron
>
> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:52 PM, James Holton <jmholton at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> Took most of last week, but I finally got it to work.
> tst_nanoBragg_pilatus.py will create a Pilatus-like image, complete with
> bad pixels, window panes, thickness effects, module-to-module misalignment
> and 0.1 deg of phi rotation.  It takes one optional argument, which is the
> image number in a sequence of 3600.  I've processed this simulated data set
> with xia2 and XDS and found the anomalous signal has the right sign.
>
> This required some edits and additions to the simTBX code as well as
> FormatCBFMini.as_file() that I think fixed a beam center consistency bug.
> Now if you dxtbx.load() and FormatCBFMiniPilatus.as_file() you get the same
> beam center in both input and output headers.  I also enhanced the header
> to make it look more like the ones in DIALS regression.  A new "SIM.F000"
> value is now available for marking the "direct beam" on the image itself.
>
> I spent most of Friday and all of this morning trying to follow the
> check-in procedure we laid out during the DIALS workshop. Not sure how, but
> it suddenly started working just now.  I believe I have checked in this
> code into the simtbx_sandbox branch of cctbx_project.  Is Jenkins looking
> at this yet?  Is anyone looking at this yet?
>
> -James Holton
> MAD Scientist
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cctbxbb mailing list
> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cctbxbb mailing listcctbxbb at phenix-online.orghttp://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cctbxbb mailing list
> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/cctbxbb/attachments/20180408/6ad2d454/attachment.htm>