<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Marcin Wojdyr <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wojdyr@gmail.com" target="_blank">wojdyr@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi, we need to pick a version of cctbx for CCP4 for use in phaser and DIALS.<br>
The latest logs at<br>
<a href="http://cci.lbl.gov/cctbx_build/show_error_summary.cgi?build_tag=2014_10_05_2205" target="_blank">cci.lbl.gov/cctbx_build/show_error_summary.cgi?build_tag=2014_10_05_2205</a><br>
show in all builds:<br>
<br>
[Errno 2] No such file or directory<br>
Traceback (most recent call last):<br>
ImportError: __import__("boost_python_meta_ext"): No module named<br>
boost_python_meta_ext<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This was an attempt to do something clever that backfired - it's fixed now. There are still some errors in the current test logs that I need to look at, and some issues with our build machines, but otherwise everything should be reasonably stable.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Is it better to pick older version?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>In this case it might be worth going back a few days. I was hoping to have a new "release" (a meaningless term in the context of CCTBX, but apparently we're expected to do this) online soon, but the 32-bit Windows build is currently MIA and we need to get that working first. However, for CCP4's purposes I think everything you use is relatively stable (but check with the DIALS developers too). It's mostly modules like mmtbx that are unstable, but I don't think Phaser uses that.</div><div><br></div><div>-Nat</div></div></div></div>