<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Marcin Wojdyr <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wojdyr@gmail.com" target="_blank">wojdyr@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I see we have some scripts with the same names as in Phenix, which may<br>
make simultaneous use of Phenix and CCP4 harder.<br>
We have cctbx.python and iotbx.lattice_symmetry (both required by<br>
xia2) and phaser.ensembler and phaser.sculptor.<br>
I haven't heard any complaints from users, so I think we'll leave it<br>
as it is. But if it was causing some problems we could find a<br>
workaround, at least for the first two wrappers.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't think this will be a big deal - officially, any command included in Phenix that doesn't start with "phenix" is at best only partially supported and definitely not advertised to [Phenix] users. And some of these commands go by multiple names anyway. As long as you delete all of the dispatchers with "phenix" in them, we should be fine. Anyone who does trip over this (external developers using CCTBX) is probably capable enough to figure it out.</div><div><br></div><div>-Nat</div></div></div></div>