<div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br>As promised, I removed ipctbx, rpmbuild, setup from cctbx. compcomm module was moved to dox.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I believe that they could be restored if necessary.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Oleg Sobolev.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Luc Bourhis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:luc_j_bourhis@mac.com" target="_blank">luc_j_bourhis@mac.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><span class=""><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div style="font-family:LucidaSans;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">fftw3tbx - probably is not used anywhere</div></div></blockquote><br></div></span><div>It is used in scitbx/fftpack/timing/eval_times.py to compare with the speed of scitbx.fftpack. Ralf wanted to see how much faster the highly optimised FFTW was. Not enough to implement a mechanism to easily swap fftpack for FFTW though but it has been years that eval_times has not been run. However I would not be surprised that the script provided by fftw3tbx to install FFTW from source does not work out of the box anymore.</div><div><br></div><div>So anyway, yes, I think it can go.</div><div><br></div><div><span class=""><div style="font-family:LucidaSans"></div><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family:LucidaSans">dox - probably was meant as documentation, actually contains some documentation in RST, Ralf's talks from Siena, 2005, some tutorial in LaTeX, the content for the cctbx website.</div></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>It contains the code to run doxygen and produce HTML pages documenting the C++ code.</div><span class=""><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><span style="font-family:LucidaSans">I suggest to move compcomm to dox despite the reference in 2009 paper</span></blockquote><br></div></span><div>Why not.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Best wishes,</div><div><br></div><div>Luc</div><div><br></div><br></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
cctbxbb mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cctbxbb@phenix-online.org">cctbxbb@phenix-online.org</a><br>
<a href="http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>