[phenixbb] selective nonbonded restraint removal

Boaz Shaanan bshaanan at bgu.ac.il
Wed Sep 5 02:44:11 PDT 2007


Hi Cathy,

 You may have tried this already but if not, at this resolution and for the particular problem you mention (ligand and side chain competing for the same site) I highly recommend Shelxl. It deals with such problems like a charm.

 Cheers,

          Boaz

----- Original Message -----
From: Cathy Lawson <cathy.lawson at rutgers.edu>
Date: Wednesday, September 5, 2007 5:32
Subject: Re: [phenixbb] selective nonbonded restraint removal
To: phenixbb at phenix-online.org

> Hi Ralf,
> 
> That is disappointing.  Lovely maps produced after a 
> few  
> phenix.refine runs
> for a 1.6 A structure revealed an unexpected tris ligand (TAM) 
> with  
> occupancy ~0.5.
> The density suggests that when tris is not there,
> a side chain moves very close to that position, thus my question.
> 
> In other regards phenix seems a great step forward in 
> automating  
> refinement, and
> I look forward to new developments.
> 
> best wishes,
> Cathy
> 
> 
> > Hi Cathy,
> >
> > > Is it possible to turn off nonbonded restraints for particular
> > > residues/monomers, or for atoms with occupancy less than 1.0?
> >
> > Nope, sorry. It is on the (long) to-do list.
> > BTW: each time someone asks the priority goes up.
> >
> > Ralf
> 
> 

Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Dept. of Life Sciences
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Beer-Sheva 84105
Israel
Phone: 972-8-647-2220 ; Fax: 646-1710
Skype: boaz.shaanan‎
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20070905/5013d1b2/attachment-0003.htm>


More information about the phenixbb mailing list