[phenixbb] phenix.xtriage says that entire res range contains anomalous signal but chart says differently?

Edward A. Berry BerryE at upstate.edu
Tue Aug 11 12:30:48 PDT 2009


Sorry, I wasn't thinking. Selenium edge, of course.
No need to backsoak, and
Not likely all three snm would be disordered.

sbiswas2 at ncsu.edu wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a chance of backsoaking even when the protein has been expressed
> as a selenomethionine derivative? I just overexpressed the protein by
> shutting down the methionine biosynthesis in E.coli and incorporated SeMet
> instead of methionine.
> The protein has three methionine and is 26kDa
> Shya
> 
> 
> 
>> Did you "backsoak" the crystal? Wouldn't heavy atom in the
>> mother liquor give a fluorescence peak even if none of it bound?
>> Ed
>>
>> sbiswas2 at ncsu.edu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I had similar problems recently, I did a wavelength scan of my crystal
>>> at
>>> the synchrotron (selenium edge) and collected one dataset at the peak
>>> wavelength.The scan gives me a distinct peak. However when I processed
>>> the
>>> data and evaluated in xtriage it says that there is no anomolous signal.
>>> I
>>> am unable to explain this? any advice?
>>> Shya
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phenixbb mailing list
>> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
>> http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> 




More information about the phenixbb mailing list