[phenixbb] Phaser RMS - What happens when it is too high
rjr27 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Jul 29 07:26:39 PDT 2009
I'm afraid there isn't an obvious sign that the RMS is set too high.
Whether the model is good or poor, if you give a high value for RMS,
then data at a resolution much higher than 2*RMS will essentially be
ignored, the likelihood functions will be relatively insensitive
(which makes sense because by giving a high RMS you're saying that not
much of the data can be explained), and the LLG values and Z-scores
will be relatively low.
All you can do in this situation is try a lower value of RMS and see
whether that makes the Z-score increase for a potential solution
(which might indicate that it is correct), or whether all the LLG
values are negative (which means you were right to have a high RMS to
For EM maps, my guess (based on intuition and not yet on data) is that
dividing the nominal resolution by two would give you a sensible
starting value for RMS.
On 29 Jul 2009, at 14:56, Peter Grey wrote:
> Hi all,
> In Phaser RMS is a crucial parameter. I had several cases where
> underestimation of RMS resulted in negative LLG.
> The cure was simply increasing the RMS. But I wonder, are there
> negative effects to a too high RMS.
> What are the dangers of giving Phaser a too high RMS ? Are there
> any indications in the output for that.
> This is also important with EM maps as models since in that case
> estimation of RMS is difficult.
> Many thanks in advance for your advice and insight,
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
Randy J. Read
Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Tel: + 44 1223 336500
Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Fax: + 44 1223 336827
Hills Road E-mail: rjr27 at cam.ac.uk
Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K. www-
More information about the phenixbb