[phenixbb] phaser version

Randy Read rjr27 at cam.ac.uk
Wed Dec 8 01:25:43 PST 2010


Yes, the version number in the source code is lagging behind the version number on the Wiki.

Randy

On 7 Dec 2010, at 21:58, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:

> Hi Bryan,
> 
> It's bed time for the Cambridge people who will have the definitive answer,
> but I'm pretty sure the wiki is misleading. What you get with the phenix
> dev installers every night is the very latest phaser version, directly
> taken from the phaser svn code repository. I just looked at the svn log
> and the Version.h file with the 2.2.4 number has not been changed since
> Feb 2010.
> 
> Ralf
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Bryan Lepore <bryanlepore at gmail.com>
>> To: PHENIX user mailing list <phenixbb at phenix-online.org>
>> Sent: Tue, December 7, 2010 1:30:03 PM
>> Subject: [phenixbb] phaser version
>> 
>> using dev-596 from source, i see `phenix.phaser --version` is
>> Phaser-2.2.4  (svn )
>> 
>> that's true for dev-601 (Intel binary) also.
>> 
>> the phaser  wiki says 2.3 is the latest, and to compile it from the
>> phenix  distribution.
>> 
>> so... wondering how to get phaser 2.3 (before asking  questions about  
>> ep_sad...)
>> 
>> -Bryan
>> _______________________________________________
>> phenixbb  mailing list
>> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

------
Randy J. Read
Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research      Tel: + 44 1223 336500
Wellcome Trust/MRC Building                   Fax: + 44 1223 336827
Hills Road                                    E-mail: rjr27 at cam.ac.uk
Cambridge CB2 0XY, U.K.                       www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk




More information about the phenixbb mailing list