[phenixbb] occupancy refinement
Marco Bellinzoni
marco.bellinzoni at pasteur.fr
Wed Jan 27 08:35:20 PST 2010
Dear Pavel,
your trick seems to me potentially 'dangerous', though: if you assign an
altloc identifier to a whole residue, its atoms won't 'see' any other
atom that does have a different altloc identifier because it is like
they don't exist at the same time - is this right? If so, in principle,
a sulfate labelled with an altloc identifier 'A' should not see
neighbouring atoms which are labelled as altloc 'B', which may well be
the whole side chain of a residue in close contact, modelled in double
conformation. That way, no restraints will be applied on close non
bonded atoms, etc...
Or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Marco
Pavel Afonine wrote:
> Hi Marco and Christian,
>
> another trick that I think will work is to assign a non-blanc altloc
> identifier to each SO4 ion. For example:
>
> HETATM 5269 S ASO4 601 88.394 7.885 58.375 1.00
> 26.69 S
> HETATM 5270 O1 ASO4 601 88.709 6.482 58.612 1.00
> 26.69 O
> HETATM 5271 O2 ASO4 601 88.383 8.143 56.832 1.00
> 26.69 O
> HETATM 5272 O3 ASO4 601 89.311 8.886 58.913 1.00
> 26.69 O
> HETATM 5273 O4 ASO4 601 87.037 8.083 58.916 1.00
> 26.69 O
> HETATM 5274 S ASO4 602 123.263 -1.833 44.610 1.00
> 41.54 S
> HETATM 5275 O1 ASO4 602 123.408 -1.546 46.092 1.00
> 41.54 O
> HETATM 5276 O2 ASO4 602 124.616 -2.116 44.068 1.00
> 41.54 O
> HETATM 5277 O3 ASO4 602 122.687 -0.633 43.944 1.00
> 41.54 O
> HETATM 5278 O4 ASO4 602 122.349 -3.008 44.466 1.00
> 41.54 O
>
> so one occupancy factor will be refined per each ion, and it will be
> constrained between 0 and 1.0.
>
> Pavel.
>
>
> On 1/27/10 1:14 AM, Marco Bellinzoni wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> all you have to do is to define each sulfate as a constrained group
>> for occupancy refinement, like this:
>>
>> constrained_group {
>> selection = "chain C and resid x"
>> }
>> constrained_group {
>> selection = "chain C and resid y"
>> }
>>
>> where resid is simply the residue number. The occupancy of all atoms
>> that belong to the same constrained group will be refined to the same
>> value.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Marco
>>
>> Christian Roth wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> I refine a structure of a protein to 1.4 A and found a few
>>> SO4-Ions. I tried to refine this sulfurs and some of these seems to
>>> be not fully occupied, as the negative difference density suggest. I
>>> tried to refine the occupancy of the sulfate ions to get an idea how
>>> strong the different binding sites might be occupied. All sulfate
>>> ions are in Chain C of my pdb. I tried to refine the occupancy
>>> individually using refine.occupancy.individual SO4 but this lead to
>>> different occupnacies for every atom for every atom and theix cant
>>> be the case for sure. Then I tried and group occupancy with
>>> resname=SO4 but now every sulfate ion has the same occupancy, which
>>> is indicated from my previous refinements also not the case,
>>> because two ions have no negative difference density. At the momentI
>>> can not figure out how I should combine the keywords for the
>>> individual occupancy refinement of the different sulfate ions. In my
>>> structure. Should I define for every ion a different chain or how I
>>> could overcome this problem?
>>> I would be very happy if anyone has a idea to sove this problem or
>>> tell me what keyword I misunderstood in the documentation.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Christian
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> phenixbb mailing list
>>> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
>>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
--
================================
Marco Bellinzoni
Unité de Biochimie Structurale
Institut Pasteur
25, rue du Dr. Roux
75724 Paris Cedex 15
France
Tel. +33 (0)1 45688608
Fax. +33 (0)1 45688604
================================
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list