[phenixbb] R factor with no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale
Pavel Afonine
PAfonine at lbl.gov
Thu May 6 21:13:21 PDT 2010
Hi Shunsuke,
at first glance, I don't see anything to worry about. It was a mistake
to print this information at all:
R-work = ..., R-free = ... (no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale)
and I will probably remove it in one of the next versions.
Your start values really are:
Start R-work = 0.2665, R-free = 0.3195
and the final ones:
Final R-work = 0.2578, R-free = 0.3126.
Thanking some more...
Actually, I don't understand why this is the case:
Start R-work = 0.3762, R-free = 0.4043 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic
scale)
Final R-work = 0.5019, R-free = 0.5204 (no bulk solvent and anisotropic
scale)
- it is weird. If you send me (to my email address, not to the whole bb)
the data and model then I will be able to provide some more diagnostics.
Are you using a recent version of PHENIX ? Is it not a result of running
TLS refinement first and then running a refinement without TLS - that
would explain this, actually, since the ANISOU all will be converted to
isotropic equivalents.
Pavel.
On 5/6/10 8:00 PM, Shunsuke Tagami wrote:
> Dear phenixbb
>
> I am refining a low resolution data (4.1 A).
> I first refined my data with CNS, then I am trying TLS refinement with
> Phenix.
> Although R-factors with bulk solvent and anisotropic scale are
> reducing, R-factor without them are increasing much.
>
> Start R-work = 0.3762, R-free = 0.4043 (no bulk solvent and
> anisotropic scale)
> Final R-work = 0.5019, R-free = 0.5204 (no bulk solvent and
> anisotropic scale)
>
> Start R-work = 0.2665, R-free = 0.3195
> Final R-work = 0.2578, R-free = 0.3126
>
> Why are R-factors with no bulk solvent and anisotropic scale
> increasing so much?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shunsuke
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list