[phenixbb] Geometry Restraints - Anisotropic truncation

Kendall Nettles knettles at scripps.edu
Tue May 1 10:34:52 PDT 2012

I have seen dramatic improvements in maps and behavior during refinement following use of the UCLA anisotropy server in two different cases. For one of them the Rfree went from 33% to 28%. I don't think it would have been publishable otherwise. 

On May 1, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Bryan Lepore wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Phil Evans <pre at mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Are anisotropic cutoff desirable?
> is there a peer-reviewed publication - perhaps from Acta
> Crystallographica - which describes precisely why scaling or
> refinement programs are inadequate to ameliorate the problem of
> anisotropy, and argues why the method applied in Strong, et. al. 2006
> satisfies this need?
> -Bryan
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

More information about the phenixbb mailing list