[phenixbb] Discrepancy between phenix.refine and phenix.model_vs_data R-factors
Abhinav Kumar
abhinavk at slac.stanford.edu
Tue Jun 11 15:32:53 PDT 2013
Thanks Pavel.
Will await the next build.
Thanks,
Abhinav
JCSG at SSRL, SLAC
(650) 926-2992
On 06/11/2013 11:40 AM, Pavel Afonine wrote:
> Hi Abhinav,
>
> thanks again for sending me the files off list. This let me to
> identify the problem and fix it. The difference between R-factors in
> phenix.refine and phenix.model_vs_data was due to a slightly different
> accounting for scattering contribution from H atoms. In both cases it
> was correct though. If I check in my changes today then next available
> nightly build will have it fixed.
>
> Pavel
>
> On 6/10/13 11:42 AM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> I am getting a significant difference between the R-factors written
>> by phenix.refine and phenix.model_vs_data.
>>
>> 1. Phenix.refine
>> phenix.refine "in.pdb" "Fobs.mtz"
>> "refinement.input.xray_data.labels=FP SIGFP"
>> "refinement.input.xray_data.high_resolution=2.50" "fix_rotamers=True"
>> "ordered_solvent=True" "strategy=tls+individual_sites+individual_adp"
>>
>> Final R-work = 0.1829, R-free = 0.2141
>>
>>
>> 2. Phenix.model_vs_data
>> phenix.model_vs_data out.pdb Fobs.mtz f_obs_label="FP"
>> r_free_flags_label="FreeR_flag" high_resolution=2.50 comprehensive=true
>>
>> r_work(re-computed) : 0.1808
>> r_free(re-computed) : 0.2099
>>
>> How can I reproduce the phenix.refine R-factors in phenix.model_vs_data?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Abhinav
>>
>> JCSG at SSRL, SLAC
>> (650) 926-2992
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20130611/258a1056/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list