[phenixbb] phenix.refine using anomalous concepts for neutron data?
pafonine at lbl.gov
Wed May 29 14:10:35 PDT 2013
>> Then how you ended up having anomalous data set for your neutron
>> observations: FO,SIGFO,DANO,SIGDANO,ISYM ?
> As I mentioned in my original mail, I've discovered that SCALA always
> outputs I+ and I- no matter what you do. From the manual:
> "Normally anomalous scattering is ignored during the scale
> determination (I+ & I- observations are treated together), but the
> merged file always contains I+ & I-, even if the ANOMALOUS OFF command
> is used."
> Thus if you don't take special precautions, e.g. in TRUNCATE, these
> will be converted to F+ and F- and (I now know) phenix.refine will use
> them. However I've now discovered that the keyword ANOMALOUS NO in
> TRUNCATE will prevent output of the anomalous columns altogether.
oh I see how this may be a problem. Though unfortunately I don't think
there is a robust way of catching this in phenix.refine.. phenix.refine
strives to do a good refinement job but obviously it can't make sure the
user provides meaningful data. Any suggestions are welcome!
>> All in all, if you don't have anomalous data make sure your inputs
>> files do not have spurious (anomalous) arrays: phenix.refine can't
>> read your mind to see what you have done in your diffraction
>> experiment - it's beyond the scope of what it's supposed to do!
> Fine, I've now learned an important lesson in input/output checking!
> But could I politely suggest that an improvement in phenix.refine's
> mind-reading capabilities: if the user mistakenly inputs a file as
> neutron data with anomalous columns in, then these should be ignored,
> as the concept is by default incompatible with neutron data?
Yes, this is doable: adding to my todo list now.
> Finally, it would also be nice if the neutron maps and not just the
> X-ray maps were displayed in Coot during refinement and if the summary
> panel at the end of refinement showed statistics for the neutron data
> as well as for the X-ray data.
Let's see what Nat thinks (he is the main and only GUI developer).
Also, the concept of joint XN refinement may change as outlined in
slides 28-32 here:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the phenixbb