[phenixbb] Two ions at same position
Pavel Afonine
pafonine at lbl.gov
Sat Aug 2 08:41:50 PDT 2014
Hi Alastair,
same chain ID + same residue number + different altlocs
will make phenix.refine to couple involved residues. Residues (residue
names) can be different.
For examples, see pages 38-39 here:
http://www.phenix-online.org/presentations/latest/pavel_phenix_refine.pdf
and also
http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/reference/refinement.html#occupancy-refinement
Pavel
On 8/2/14, 8:36 AM, Alastair Fyfe wrote:
> I also ran into this recently and was puzzled about the correct PDB
> encoding. Using the same residue number with differing altloc, atom
> name and element fields seems straightforward but what should the
> residue name be ? In my experience not all PDB-processing software is
> happy with different residue names for the same residue number. Is
> there definitive PDB documentation for this case?
> thanks,
> Alastair
>
> On 08/02/2014 08:12 AM, Pavel Afonine wrote:
>>
>> On 8/2/14, 5:36 AM, Elke De Zitter wrote:
>>> you should make sure the summation of their occupancies equals 1.
>>
>> While this might help refinement convergence, in general this is not
>> necessarily because phenix.refine will constrain coupled occupancies
>> to add up to 1.
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> phenixbb mailing list
>> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20140802/20a5d235/attachment.htm>
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list